Skip to content

Conversation

@cosmo0920
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cosmo0920 cosmo0920 requested review from a team and eschabell as code owners January 27, 2026 08:05
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@cosmo0920 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@cosmo0920 cosmo0920 force-pushed the cosmo0920-add-remote-addr-related-parameters-for-in_splunk branch from ec9e45f to d840e37 Compare January 27, 2026 09:31
@cosmo0920 cosmo0920 force-pushed the cosmo0920-add-remote-addr-related-parameters-for-in_splunk branch from d840e37 to 96c817a Compare January 27, 2026 09:31
@eschabell eschabell self-assigned this Jan 27, 2026

| Key | Description | Default |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| `add_remote_addr` | Inject the client remote address into the record. The value is extracted from the X-Forwarded-For header if present, otherwise from the connection address. | `false` |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cosmo0920 the X-Forwared-for should be enclosed in code quotes (back-ticks) in line 11.

@eschabell eschabell added waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes waiting-on-review Waiting on a review from mainteners labels Jan 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

5.0 waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes waiting-on-code-merge waiting-on-review Waiting on a review from mainteners

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants