README.md - syntax error in the "Executing JavaScript & Extract..." example

[AkosLukacs]

Typo in the "Executing JavaScript & Extract Structured Data without LLMs" example.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected the JsonCssExtractionStrategy schema example by properly closing the fields array and placing the final object brace correctly. This fixes syntax issues in the sample, preventing copy‑paste parsing errors and improving readability for implementers. No functional changes or API updates.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation fix in README.md: corrected the JSON example for JsonCssExtractionStrategy by properly closing the fields array with a closing bracket and moving the final closing brace to the correct position. No code, API, or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation example fix README.md	Corrected JSON example syntax: added closing ] for the fields array and placed the final } after it. No runtime or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, README bright,
A bracket hops into its rightful site.
Arrays now close, braces align—
Parsers purr, examples shine.
Thump-thump! says my fluffy heart,
Docs and code, a tidy art. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR description is a single-line note about a typo and does not follow the repository's required template; it omits the "Summary", "List of files changed and why", "How Has This Been Tested?", and the Checklist sections from the template. Because those required sections are missing, the description check fails.	Please update the PR description to match the repository template by adding a Summary that states the fix and references any related issue numbers, a "List of files changed and why" (e.g., README.md — fix closing bracket in the JSON code sample), and a "How Has This Been Tested?" section describing manual verification and any lint or unit tests run. Complete the Checklist items to reflect your verification steps and, if helpful, include a short before/after snippet of the README example to make review straightforward.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the affected file (README.md) and the core issue (a syntax error in the "Executing JavaScript & Extract..." example), so it accurately reflects the primary change in the changeset and is specific enough for a reviewer to understand the intent.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

README.md (2)

450-453: Rename variable and avoid potential IndexError

The extracted data represents courses, not companies, and indexing element 0 can crash on empty results.

Apply:

-        companies = json.loads(result.extracted_content)
-        print(f"Successfully extracted {len(companies)} companies")
-        print(json.dumps(companies[0], indent=2))
+        courses = json.loads(result.extracted_content)
+        print(f"Successfully extracted {len(courses)} courses")
+        if courses:
+            print(json.dumps(courses[0], indent=2))
+        else:
+            print("No courses extracted")

---

398-429: Clarify “JSON” vs Python dict in docs

This example defines a Python dict schema (not a JSON string). Consider adding a one‑liner note to avoid confusion for readers expecting raw JSON.

Example note: “schema is a Python dict passed directly to JsonCssExtractionStrategy; if you have a JSON string, load it first with json.loads(...).”

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e651e04 and cd7594d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

428-429: Bracket/brace fix LGTM

The fields array and enclosing object are now properly closed; the snippet parses and runs.